The New Way Forward
Re-Orienting Ch.7 "Working with Values"
The matrix-table provided in the previous Topic is new. So, those familiar with Ch.7 will require to re-orient their thinking. My original account needed some restructuring and modification for the following reasons:
- formulations lacked awareness of the encompassing Taxonomy;
- insufficient structural corroboration led to inconsistency and incoherence;
- understanding of the function of Principal Typologies and Spirals was limited;
- the psychotherapeutic perspective was over-used.
Even allowing for reformulations offered in the summaries, the bulk of the propositions presented in Ch.7 remain broadly correct. However, in retrospect, I regard some of these as too imprecise, clumsy or confusing, and therefore hard to apply. To enable comparisons, extracts from Ch.7 will be provided in the following two Topics.
■ Download the complete Ch.7 here.
A New Name for a New Understanding
The present general understanding of Principal Typologies has led to the earlier name of "Identity Development" being changed to or more simply: . Review experiential fluidity.
Other alternative names have been considered: More ►
The various Typologies. The crucial difference here is that everyone must give serious attention to this sphere of human functioning, while not everyone must be concerned about, say, a , or a .
do naturally lead to the development of an identity (from which the "self" notion arises). But this is just like all other taxonomicAs a result, these Methods in other Typologies might well be labeled differently e.g. occupational, scientific, ethical &c.) The are therefore frequently referred to as « » e.g. . (cf. the Ch.7 term: "beings".)
are in nature.Old Names for Types Remain: The all retain their original names with « » or « » or « » tacked on.
New Function
Taxonomic fundamentals are now viewed primarily as processes which have psychosocial functions. The function here is not to "develop identity" (as the earlier psycho-therapeutic perspective suggested), but to ensure our minds are generally steady enough to use our unique personal experiences and other relevant identities so as to deal with our various endeavours effectively and on our own terms.
In order to clarify and distinguish the preoccupation of each was teased out: see Col. 3 in the Matrix accessible below. This continuing preoccupation serves as the (new) orienting perspective for formulating each .
, theFor each
, it seems possible to identify a distinctive:• Core Stabilizer
whose nature derives from the corresponding .
• Personal Commitment
which requires significant effort and determination to be handled well.
• Psychosocial Emphasis
which brings to the fore the distinctiveness of each method.
• Sustaining Processes
which are essential for continued effective use of the method.
See the Summary Matrix again ►
Apart from a re-orientation, current inquiries have forced a major change in formulation for the next Topic), and a variety of less significant adjustments to the other , as explained here.
(seeMaster-Tables 11 and 12 in Ch. 7 are still relevant. However, they would now be constructed differently with altered column headings.
Little will be said in this section about psychoanalytical/psychological theories, techniques and related personality disorders. It is a complex area and I have not given it significant new attention.
- See the reformulated L'1-Sensory method.
- See comments on other methods: .
- Review the expected dualities: oscillating and unfolding.
- Go directly to the TET analysis.
Originally posted: 10-Nov-2014. Last Updated: 11-Dec-2014