Personal Needs and Politics (CL7)

The personal context of politics is about people going about their lives and seeking to meet their needs by interacting with others. So it includes the private sector and civil society—everything which should be as free as possible from government intrusion.

We started with the powerful at CL1, reached the people en masse at last at CL5, and we now finally reach the people as unique persons living in communities at CL7.

The vast majority of personal needs can be best handled by leaving it up to individuals, who should know themselves far better than anyone else can. Each can then associate and transact freely with others using their personal preferences and judgements.

There is a particular human need to engage effectively with society, which occupies a special place in CL7 by virtue of its link to the communalist mode.

It seems as if the corrosive behaviours of the powerful, that imperil the meeting of needs, are aided by the absence of a direct path between CL7-persons and CL3-political players.

In any case, no-one can wholly opt-out of politics: as explained later in detail in Handling Political Tensions.

Are Human Needs Private or Social?

Personal needs are met within communities and other social settings. Any communal need (e.g. clean air, safe travel) reflects a personal need, and any personal need (e.g. clothing, shelter, work) is also a general need of the community.

The personal context for politics and its direct channels of influence.

There is no personal need that lacks some community relevance, or a purely social need utterly disconnected from the needs of particular individuals.

This Centre is therefore balanced.

Community v Society

Individuals are naturally diverse in their needs as well as their interests, and they form groups with common values and goals. There can be reasonable disagreements within any community about: •priorities amongst needs, & •how needs may best be met—based on:

  • differences of view;
  • limitations of knowledge; and
  • the inability to foresee the future.

These should be resolved with communalist values like mutuality and reciprocity i.e. the give-and-take of living together on a daily basis.

Human needs are not primarily met within society (in the sense of the nation-state): they are met locally in neighbourhoods, districts and small communities. Groups may have little representation in any community. So interests are pursued by groups within society and severe conflict can emerge locally or more widely whenever the self-interested battle for wealth and power intrudes. This takes us back to where we started at CL1 i.e. the use of power is an inescapable challenge for everyone.

Power gravitates to wherever it can have maximum impact: and this is commonly at the societal-governmental level. Arrangements for the whole of society may bring benefits or cause harm at the local level, because they can never be sensitive to the particular circumstances of specific districts or towns.

Bottom-line: a local community (or a community of shared values) is the only arena within which most people can get their needs met. This was the message of the Communalist mode. Also see: political organization in different sized territories.

  • Look at influences linked to human needs,
    With this Topic, the conversion of a trajectory of political maturation into a hierarchy of determinants of political choice will be complete.

  • Continue to a review of the full picture.

    &

  • Applications of this framework to other groups.

Originally posted: July 2009; Last updated: 12 June 2014.