Communication Usually Fails, Except by Accident
Wiio's Law, Lemmas and Corollaries
The Law: Communication usually fails, except by accident.
- If communication can fail, it will.
- If communication cannot fail, it still most usually fails.
- If communication seems to succeed in the intended way, there's a misunderstanding.
- If you are content with your message, communication certainly fails.
- If a message can be interpreted in several ways, it will be interpreted in a manner that maximizes the damage.
- There is always someone who knows better than you what you meant with your message.
- The more we communicate, the worse communication succeeds.
- The more we communicate, the faster misunderstandings propagate.
Korpela adds:
Give the student a chance to realize he misunderstood it all.
Wiio's law, essentially a result of long observation, is given some theoretical underpinning by the present framework.
At the level of the single made subservient to something else, it would be amazing if it didn't go wrong.
, much can go wrong. If we add to this, that is oftenThe matrix-table below summarizes the elemental errors and special difficulties according to Level. The errors cumulate as you rise up the hierarchy to what seems most important.
This Matrix summarizes propositions about each elemental Level. Note that the functions for the Sender and Recipient are shown combined.
Better viewing: narrow or close left navigation column; use browser zoom if needed.
L | Process & Structure |
Function | Errors S= Sender R = Recipient |
Special Difficulties |
---|---|---|---|---|
7 |
& |
To activate an experiential state that maintains the potential for sending &/or receiving meaningful messages. | S & R: Not recognizing one's own limitations. + all lower level errors. |
Lack of curiosity; personal inhibition; socio-cultural repression. |
6 |
& |
To embed a sense of something in the content of a communicative event: the sender generates and the recipient attributes within a specific context. | S & R: Assuming others are identical to oneself (i.e. lack of a shared language). + all lower level errors. |
Indirect styles of expression; use of idiosyncratic or outdated expressions. |
5 |
& (syn. ) |
To use something to make specific reference to an object of experience—outer, inner, virtual or imaginary—for use in a social context; or regard it as so doing. | S & R: Lack of discrimination (i.e. sloppy use of terms). + all lower level errors. |
Inability or unwillingness to make useful discriminations; lack of vocabulary. |
4 |
& |
To use something to represent and evoke ideas from a different domain of discourse; or regard it as so doing. | S: Assuming a non-informed recipient understands. R: Insensitivity or literal-mindedness + all lower level errors. |
Degeneration of the symbol; poor cultural awareness; lack of conversational experience; schizophrenia. |
3 |
& (syn. ) |
To use something to indicate or suggest something else within a single domain of discourse; or regard it as so doing. | S: Assuming a non-informed recipient understands. R: Mistake (e.g. misattribution) + all lower level errors. |
Lack of knowledge of the relevant domain &/or social context. |
2 |
& |
To use a specific stimulus or pattern of stimuli to convey a specific content or message; or regard it as so doing. | S: Not expecting people to depend on it. R: Ignorance + Inattention (L1). |
Entering a social environment and not knowing essential rules. |
1 |
& |
To use the elemental biological means for sending or receiving any message. | S: Insufficient or inappropriate stimulation. R: Inattention. |
Biological damage e.g. blindness, deafness. Autism. |
The sheer number of potential errors in any
combined with the numerous events in a complex make Wiio's law unsurprising.If you cannot THEE seek to provide some useful insights to this end.
successfully, you can at least increase the odds of accidental success. Formulations of withinOriginally posted 27-May-2011; Last updated 25-Jul-2011.