Responsibility & Proactivity

Being responsible and being proactive are not usually compared: however, they are similar in that they are both about commitment to the organization and both are dependent on perceptiveness. Explore additional similarities and differences in the component means of achievement here.

Unique Components

CL7: Evolving Mindsets

Being responsible requires an active perceptive effort to adjust your own mindset and those of others in the light of deep changes in the nature of work, the organization or society. You must also perceive your own position to make an ethical choice. By contrast, being proactive must ignore such issues.
Why? Closed In order to promptly grasp what is going on in the here-and-now and what might be done.

CL1: Taking Action

Being proactive is based on the premise that deliberate action is essential and even urgent to deal with what is coming—i.e. taking action is the foundation of proactivity. By contrast, being responsible floats above action.
Why?Closed In order to carefully reflect, inquire and communicate.

We can now consider the 5 levels that are shared, starting from below.

Common Components

CL2: Being Accountable

Being responsible is based on deliberately accepting accountability in the widest possible sense.

By contrast:
being proactive recognizes accountability only as a formal requirement that shapes the handling of oneself and others in getting things done.

CL3: Gripping Issues

Being responsible sees gripping issues as a formal matter related to recognition, clarification and reporting, without any necessary requirement for action.

By contrast,
being proactive leads to an involvement with issues that are perceived as generating difficulties in the future. These issues must be handled in an acceptable fashion to support whatever activity is being pursued.

CL4: Setting Direction

Being responsible requires setting values and goals for self and others that are acceptable and therefore likely to be appreciated and used.

By contrast,
being proactive requires setting directions that affect others and require their prompt cooperation: so it must be done collaboratively.

CL5: Using Information

Being responsible requires information to be used collaboratively because objectivity is needed to justify attention to whatever is being addressed.

By contrast,
being proactive seeks information to be knowledgeable about the situation so that deliberate action can be precise, timely and targeted.

CL6:  Channeling Aspirations

Being responsible requires being knowledgeable about aspirations so as to maintain a realistic appreciation of what drives people and therefore what can be expected from them.

By contrast,
being proactive requires sufficient perceptiveness about aspirations in order to carry people along with conviction when getting things done.


But commitment cannot be demonstrated generally or according to whim—it must be focused. This focus comes from an agreement that reflects the mutual bond of obligation between management and employee. It is far more personally and socially important than the employment contract.

  • Its THEE-name is the compact, constituted by the final heptadic grouping of all levels.

riginally posted: 11-Nov-2011