Design Roles: G4

Competence needs Organisation

All work within an organization is performed by staff in specifically designed roles, and that is how all the kinds of work required are covered. The organizational structure is a structure of roles because the duties assigned in G1 (corresponding to levels of work) are naturally assigned to a staff-member holding a specific role.

The quality of work performed will be dependent on the competence of staff in the various roles.

The general public usually regards focused competence (or kind of work) as an occupation, discipline or profession. However, within an organization it is commonly referred to as a «function». There are always a few and often very many functions within any organization. The number and diversity of necessary functions is one measure of the intrinsic complexity of an organization.

Competence involves:

Because any specific work activity is an expression of a function, all designed roles must exist within a particular function. This function must itself be organised so that issues like •role design, •suitable recruitment, •staff training, •updating of expertise are all properly managed.

As a result, there is a need to see a function as an organizational entity in its own right. It requires its own dedicated development within the organization so as to enhance its contribution. That entails considering the functioncomprehensively, and this can be ensured by adding an additional (fourth) level of duty.

4 Types of Function

Proceeding on this basis produces 4 overlapping 4-Level hierarchical Groups (Tetrads): see diagram. These types of function within an organization are named in terms of the lowest Level:

  G41
Specialist Action Functions
e.g. Receptionist, Painter
WL4 + WL3 + WL2 + WL1
  G42

Specialist Assessment Functions
e.g. Architect, Doctor
WL5 + WL4 + WL3 + WL2

  G43 Specialist System Functions
e.g. Management Accountant, Systems Analyst
WL6 + WL5 + WL4 + WL3
  G44 General Management Function
e.g. General Manager
WL7 + WL6 + WL5 + WL4

The focus of the Type of Function shifts progressively from being specific and concrete to being general and abstract. However, all Types overlap at WL4, and this is where general management must be locked securely into the other specialist functions in managing operations.
ClosedMore

WL4 is simultaneously the lowest level at which it is still possible to consider services in abstract terms, and the highest level at which it is essential to focus on concrete details. e.g. actual personalities and approved establishment, actual equipment and technological developments, actual facilities and planned provision.

The goal here, best owned by the general manager, is to serve the mission and prevent or stop turf wars and battles over which function is more important.

Note that WL4 is also the centre-point of the accountability framework.

Features

Function: The Tetrads enable areas of work activity to be demarcated, owned, and competently handled for the benefit of a specific organization.

QualityFunctions need to be managed comprehensively to ensure their development and organizational contribution, especially in regard to the proper design of all roles.

Integration within each Group: The function standardizes and develops expert processes, methods, knowledge and skills around a professional/occupational identity, in a way that serves the organization's needs.

Integration across all Groups: All types of function have roles performing work at WL4 where, despite differences in orientation, given values must be translated into concrete outputs.

Psychological Correlate: Culturally endorsed work identity is socialized via training within a societally-recognized discipline, profession, or occupation.

Personal Tension: Loyalty to a work-identity and its development within wider society, versus loyalty to a particular organization with its idiosyncratic goals and needs.

Social Correlate: The existence of academic and technical training and research institutions within wider society; and hence a reservoir of people with relevant knowledge and skills on which organizations can draw.

Organisational Tension: Functional boundaries tend to be resistant to alternative ways to divide up the work e.g. by geography, by needs, by customer niches, by products.

Practical Implications: Function-based role structures are essential and powerful. The power can become degenerate and must be controlled via a suitable management culture and the use of cross-functional teams. The need for a general management function generates dual influence authority relations.


Originally posted: 19-Mar-2014