Arenas & Other Social Groups

What is «Associating» About?

Associating, the human urge to be with others, is one of the 7 primal needs of human beings. Each primal need is served by one of the Primary Domains, and the Communication Domain (RL5/PH5) serves associating. Any enduring social group satisfies this need and, if it is to become strong, leads to the formation of a shared reality.

Any willingly constituted group is an association. So a crowd or a set of people in a lift would not be a group in this sense because they have not chosen to associate. The taxonomy has identified a natural social group labeled «Association» which is defined by a set of people who willingly share an identity-defining aim for their group (i.e. the PH6L4 Principal Object).

Arenas of Associating define categories of groups that are more substantial and significant. These Arenas contain groups that have been constituted to meet a second primal need in addition to the primal need to associate. These Arenas are defined by the Q-expansion of the use of language methods (PH'5). Societal institution is the name assigned to the 4th Arena (PH'5Q4).

Natural Social Groups

The Taxonomy has previously identified our foundational Natural Social Groups. These spontaneously emerge around Levels of Value in the Purpose Domain as listed in the Table below. See a detailed account in Ch.5 Working with Values.

L7 Ultimate Values Humanity
L6 Value Systems Tribes
L5 Social Values Communities
L4 Principal Objects Associations
L3 Internal Priorities Factions

Most groups formal and informal are associations, in that they are created with a particular defining (i.e. PH6L4) purpose in mind. The L4-aim of an informal group of friends might be to meet over coffee or take a holiday together. Formalized groups, like firms, clubs and other social bodies, have a written constitution which spells out the L4 "aims and objects" whose acceptance becomes a condition of membership.

The Arenas of associating (PH'5Q) fit into this framework. They lead to groups that are specialized in that they require work (in the sense of essential deliberate sustained effort) above and beyond merely turning up and participating. As indicated above, each Arena primarily serves one of the 7 primal needs as well as the primal need to associate.

What about Society?

Society is not a formal name for any «natural social group». It refers here to a coalescence of communities, ideally sharing a culture and for the purposes of defence i.e. to members of an extra large L5-territorial community which develops a sovereign government.

Members of such societies require societal institutions to flourish. However, these depend on political maturation as explained later.

The term has been used within the Taxonomy as «wider society», which referred to... Closed the social context of a natural group: undifferentiated people who are not participating in a group, but who may affect or be affected by the group. I am inclined to think now that this context is the relevant societal institution.

Associating Arenas & their Primal Need Focus

It may be helpful to put the present study of societal institutions-Q4 into the context of related Arenas.

• For a taxonomic explanation of Arenas, visit the Architecture Room here;
• For more on the set of Associating Arenas visit here.
• For a graphic providing a taxonomic overview, click on the thumbnail at right.

Click the Q-name below for a brief reminder note.

Terminology Confusions

In speaking about societal institutions-Q4, it is necessary to use terms like "problems", "solutions", "inquiry", "debate", whose meaning is reasonably clear when there is an example. However, in the abstract, it is very easy to interpret these terms as if they apply to an organisation-Q2 or an individual's project.

For example, as part of management in a business there is often a need to "debate" options with the aim of reaching a compromise or perhaps a leader decides the preferred choice. By contrast, "debate" in an institution is about understanding and challenging the values and perspectives of different camps. It is accepted that all perspectives have some validity and it is understood that there is no superior authority or immediate definitive resolution.

Similarly, a "problem" at work is an interference to achievement about which it is possible to get the facts, determine a cause and then introduce a practical solution. But a "problem" in an institution can never be addressed so directly. It is typically a form of persistent failing related to conflicting values and beliefs, involving numerous factors and with a historical basis. Further, there will be some who benefit from it and actively or passively interfere with attempts at remediation.

To mitigate this problem, I will seek terms that should act as a reminder. In the examples above, I use "challenge" rather than "debate", and I refer to "failings" rather than "problems". Rather than refer to "data" or "information", I will refer to "statistics"; and rather than refer to "solutions", I will refer to a "remedies", and so on.


Originally posted: 14-Nov-2022. Last amended: 30-Apr-2023.