Application to Domain Controls
Reminder: Taxonomic Principle
It is now taken as a principle that the apparent correspondences in taxonomic frameworks relate not to the Root Level as such, but rather to a psychosocial pressure that is intrinsic to the Root Level.
The psychosocial pressures function as internal and external drivers or motivators. They are probably of neuro-biological origin and cannot be turned off. However, their manifestations may be suppressed.
Grouping |
|
Psychosocial Pressure |
---|---|---|
G7- KL7 | is subject to pressure for | Selflessness |
G6 - KL6 | is subject to pressure for | Well-being |
G5 - KL5 | is subject to pressure for | Acceptability |
G4 - KL4 | is subject to pressure for | Certainty |
G3 - KL3 | is subject to pressure for | Performance |
G2 - KL2 | is subject to pressure for | Understanding |
G1 - KL1 | is subject to pressure for | Autonomy |
Explanation with Two Examples
Any explanation of the ordering of the psychosocial pressures must apply equal to every Structural Hierarchy within the taxonomy. (It is currently estimated that there are 67 in all.)
An application to Primal Fields found in the Domain Fundamentals was considered here. It is necessary now to take examples from the Domain Controls to confirm the Field concept and correspondence makes sense. (However, note that this is where the correspondence was discovered.)
I will use
and as my examples for the Control sH-Triplets.Domain | Spiral-Tree: Primal Need |
Spiral-sH: Control Effect |
sH-Tree: Control Field |
---|---|---|---|
Determinants of Governance | Exercising Autonomy |
Participation in Politics | |
Determinants of Achievement | Improving Performance | Expectations of Management |
The Controls for specifies the . The Control Field for these is the . The effects of these expectations are shown in the whose components are focused on .
inThe Controls for specifies the . The Control Field for these is . The effects of this participation are shown in the whose components are focused on .
in
The argument that follows is identical to that provided for the Domain Fundamentals.
autonomy.
is the foundation of the Field, everything must find its basis there. It appears to be under the pressure of- : =
- : =
In both examples, it seems evident that if functioning is not autonomous, then all control is vitiated.
understanding. It seems evident that once autonomy has been activated, it is essential to be able to communicate those choices both to oneself and others.
typically provides a control that effectively guides the use of . It appears to be under the pressure of- In Domain Control: =
- In Domain Control: = .
The dyads link adjacent monads and overlap. This ensures a consistency and coherence in the control structure i.e. the or the .
performance, the pressure.
is typically the context and appears to be under a pressure for- In Domain Control: =
- In Domain Control: =
Correspondence then continues in ascending
order, so:certainty:
is under the pressure for- In Domain Control: =
- In Domain Control: =
acceptability:
is under the pressure for- In Domain Control: =
- In Domain Control: =
well-being:
is under the pressure for- In Domain Control: =
- In Domain Control: =
selflessness:
is under pressure for- In Domain Control: =
- In Domain Control: =
Field Division
The Control Field Tree also possesses an internal duality, whose division splits the upper 3 context levels from the lower 4 cntent levels. These are summarized in the Naming Investigation. Note that, unlike in the Fundamentals, the internal duality is not used for naming the final sH Control Tree.
The division between Control Field by involving the most personal and most impersonal pressures; while the lower five levels which deal with what is actually occurring enable change of the Control Field.
and , shows a similar significance. The upper two levels enable persistence and continuity of theThis completes the main part of the investigation of the Root Projection.
The final focus of investigation of the Root Projection, the Q-expansion, took place much later and benefited from the findings and hypotheses developed in this section. The study was performed as part of the Naming investigation.
Originally posted 15-Jun-2015. Last updated 12-Jan 2023.