Principles of Q Formation
Arenas
To this point, a Domain's Primal Need is met by the Domain's fundamental triplet. The key factors determining the quality of delivery of the Need by the triplet lies within Level-6 of the Primary Hierarchy which contains the Domain controls in the form of Optimizers and the derived Spiral Complex.
As postulated earlier, the Arenas must contribute to delivering the primal need in a different fashion. This difference must now be examined.
Linkage with Domains Above & Below
The use of the Arenas appears to involve the controlling level (PH•L6) of the next lower Domain which is under the pressure of autonomy. The L6 function is qualified by a term (highighted below) deriving from the relevant Domain.
So:
managerial .
are foci forexplicable
are foci fordiscriminating
are foci forself-
are foci forgroup
are foci forpolitical
are foci formastered
are foci forIt seems that the under the pressure of autonomy, activates the Domain's Arenas.
of the next higher Domain's effect ), which also operatesSo:
The finding that both links are driven by the psychosocial pressure for Autonomy (projecting from originally) leads to the conclusion that Arenas define spheres where autonomy is highly significant in our personal lives.
Refining the Primal Need
The question to be asked now is:
What is different about the handling of the Primal Need within the Arenas in comparison to using the Domain's fundamentals or Spiral-Tree?
And then there is a subsidiary question:
Do Domain controls emerging from the Spiral still apply to the Arenas?
We can use the linkages described above and buttress this with findings from inquiries into the
. It appears that while the references any and every social group, the Arenas handle special social groups where responsibility (work-in-role)and social identification come to the fore: as in . Of course the Domain's controls still apply in that it remains essential to and to .Looking at all the Arenas now and using the linkages from above.
questioning and involving improved capability, can generate momentum. This momentum will be subject to pressures for performance and management .
, being a response toevolution of situations and involving choice, generate conclusions that may be temporary. Conclusions can still be treated as conjectures pressing for certainty and calling for .
, being a response to theattention and involving judgements, probably lead to orientations. Orientations can still be determined by acceptability and subject to .
, being a response toexchanges with others and involving self-representation in the form of self-images or a self-concept, enable self-preservation. Self-preservation remains subject to pressures to sustain well-being and .
, being a response toresponsibility and involving social identification, generate social entities built via work-in-role. Work in those entities involves pressures for understanding and contests over the .
, being a response tohope in dimensions of political significance, generate benefits. The benefits depend on pressing for autonomy and require .
, being a response toactivity and involving mastering a paradigm, generate confidence. Confidence must still be handled selflessly and competence regularly .
, being a response to necessaryBased on the above, we have now some understanding of Arenas at the Domain level. The next task is to reach the framework level and identify each of the 7 Arenas in each of the 7 Primary Domains. The goal is not to develop those frameworks here in the Architecture Room, but simply to know what frameworks need to be developed. For now, what is known will be posted in the Taxonomy Notes section, and in due course after much study, details will be posted as a Satellite.
The natural place to start is with Domains where some knowledge has already been gained. The
meets that criterion. Conclusions from there can then be applied and tested against the much more developed .- Start now with the 7 Knowing Arenas-PH'2Q.
Originally posted: 24-Sep-2022