Applying Styles to the Domain Typologies
PH'1Q: 28 Levels in the Arenas of Achieving
Review a summary of here.
Recall the Style Hierarchy developed in the preceding Topic:
| L | PH'1 |
|---|---|
| δ | Resolving |
| γ | Challenging |
| β | Shaping |
| α | Generating |
Now, by applying this Style Hierarchy to each of the , it has been possible to provide labels that characterize recognizable achieving roles. Note that there may well be other possible labels.
L'1: 
Rationalist Method
L'2: Empiricist Method
L'3: Pragmatic Method
L'4: Dialectic Method
L'5: Systemicist Method
L'6: Structuralist Method
L'7: Imaginist Method
PH'2Q: 28 Levels in the Arenas of Knowing
Review a summary of here.
Recall the Style Hierarchy developed in the preceding Topic:
| L | PH'2 |
|---|---|
| δ | Anchoring |
| γ | Evaluating |
| β | Organizing |
| α | Grounding |
Now, by applying this Style Hierarchy to each of the , it has been possible to provide labels that characterize recognizable knowing roles. Note that there may well be other possible labels.
L'1: Empirical Method
L'2: Analytic Method
L'3: Explanatory Method
L'4: Dialectic Method
L'5: Holistic Method
L'6: Formal Method
L'7: Contemplative Method
PH'4: 28 Levels in the Arenas of Individualizing
Review a summary of here.
Recall the Style Hierarchy developed in the preceding Topic:
| L | PH'4 |
|---|---|
| δ | Anchoring |
| γ | Differentiating |
| β | Constraining |
| α | Activating |
In the previous two Domains, applying the Style Hierarchy has generated role-types. Possibly starting in , but certainly in , it seems that distinctive psychological states emerge rather than social roles. It has been possible to provide labels that characterize recognizable individualizing states.
Labels proposed here are less certain.
L'1: Sensory Method
L'2: Vital Method
L'3: Emotional Method
L'4: Individual Method
L'5: Relational Method
L'6: Social Method
L'7: Transpersonal Method
PH'5: 28 Levels in the Arenas of Associating
Review a summary of here.
Recall the Style Hierarchy developed in the preceding Topic:
| L | PH'5 |
|---|---|
| δ | Developing |
| γ | Systematizing |
| β | Appraising |
| α | Asserting |
Unlike the Domains listed above, applying this Style Hierarchy appears to generates distinctive processes rather than roles or states. It should be possible to provide labels that characterize recognizable associating processes.
L'1: Concrete Method
L'2: Associative Method
L'3: Conceptual Method
L'4: Universal Method
L'5: Gestalt Method
L'6: Logical Method
L'7: Mythic Method
PH'6: 28 Levels in the Arenas of Governing
Review a summary of here.
Recall the Style Hierarchy developed in the preceding Topic:
| L | PH'6 |
|---|---|
| δ | Anchoring |
| γ | Contesting |
| β | Constraining |
| α | Grounding |
By applying this Style Hierarchy to each of the , it seems possible to provide labels that characterize recognizable governing rationales.
L'1: Rationalist Method
L'2: Conventionalist Method
L'3: Pluralist (Pragmatist) Method
L'4: Individualist Method
L'5: Communalist Method
L'6: Legitimist Method
L'7: Transcendentalist Method
Review
From the above, it seems that the Q-expansion may have different effects according to the Domain. Light may be shed when and Arenas are determined.
- and : generation of roles.
- : generation of states.
- : generation of processes.
- : generation of rationales.
The next step in this investigation involves determining some principles for identifying the Arenas which straddle two adjacent Methods.
Originally published: 24-Sep-2022