Control of Change

This webpage provides a quick summary and technical overview of the key structures and concepts that will be developed and referenced in what follows.

The Spiral Complex

Following THEE principles, the depiction types in the Change Domain Typology are alternative methods of control for optimizing use of the fundamentals in the Change Domain RL3. They do this by guiding the use of definitive stages, the Domain Vehicle that changes systems so as to enable a sustained progression, which is the Domain Field.

This graphic lays out the fundamentals in the Change Domain:

Fundamentals of the change domain.

Diagonals on the TET plot reveal a duality in depiction paradigms: domination versus evolution.

The depiction methods can be holistically viewed and appreciated using a TET diagram as presented in the previous section and shown at right. The TET axes for handling complexity (X) and seeking control (Y) form the psychosocial context of any sustained progression (PsH3).

While the depiction methods are distinct and incompatible, some assumptions and principles within each of the methods are widely shared values. By abstracting these values and converting methods for proceedingto modes of functioning, it is possible to combine them. Combination is developed by progressively cumulating modes to generate a developmental Spiral on the TET. This Spiral, in turn, reveals additional control mechanisms.

Any Spiral Control Complex specifies essential Domain features, the most important of which are:

  1. Psychosocial Pressure
    Each Root Level defines a Primary Domain and carries a psychosocial pressure which has a neuro-biological origin and can be irresistible in practice.

    In the case of Change-RL3, the psychosocial pressure is conjectured to be Acceptability.

  2. Primal Need
    Each Domain exists to meet a instinctive vital need, the primal need, essential for personal survival. The need is handled by the Domain Fundamentals.

    In the case of Change-RL3, this need is conjectured to be Fitness in the sense of fitting-in, suitability or appropriateness in the exissting socio-physical environment.

    All Domain Fundamentals (i.e. a definitive stage, system changes, and any sustained progression) are therefore evaluated in terms of their fitness.

  3. Primal Means
    Controlling Domain Fundamentals, there is a specific primal means that plays a major role in meeting the primal need and can operate with varying degrees of sophistication according to a person's (or group's choice.

    In the case of Change-RL3, the primal means to enable fitness is conjectured to be Clarification.

    Fitness requires clarification of situations as a core psychic state around which personal functioning in general can operate. Because fitting in is a continuing requirement for social existence, the degree and quality of clarification is directly relevant to maintaining acceptability.

  4. Primal Controller
    The primal means is itself subject to control by Requirements associated with and responding to the Domain's psychosocial pressure: acceptability.

    The Controller is currently conjectured to be criticism. This puts clarification under a pressure for acceptability with the goal of reliably ensuring a person's psychosocial fitness.

The proposed relation between the Depiction Methods and the Domain Controls for Change-RL3 is shown in the diagram below:

 

Controls within the change domain.

See Taxonomy Notes for provisional outlines of the structural hierarchy and its tree.


Originally posted: 30-Oct-2024. Last amended: 20-Apr-2025.