Channels around the Periphery

CL7_B-context-driven adjustments have to recognize the importance of CL6_S-authoritative reports and strive to adhere to any position and principles within them. However, deference does not mean ignoring local realities.

Authoritative reports may be axiomatic and expect to automatically applied, but it must be recognized that every actual situation is different and certain features cannot be ignored to enable intellectual purity. Appropriate changes must be allowed.

The CL5_S-prevailing mindset is naturally rather general and somewhat vague on details, but it will be influenced by any effectively disseminated CL6_S-authorized reports.

Prevailing mindsets can affect the production of an authoritative report, encouraging the author in regard to emphases and even the tone of the communication.

The prevailing CL3_S-mindsets are typically riven with dualistic positions and polarized thinking of all sorts. So they can be the route to exposing relevant CL3_P-polarities in a situation.

However, the prevailing mindset may also handle situational polarities by denying their existence and blaming externalities for tensions. Once the polarities are articulated, such a popular outlook will be exposed to reveal any denials or other distortions.

Awareness of crucial CL3_P-underlying polarities in the situation will be used to judge the plausibility of any CL1_B-explanations.

Plausible explanations also pass judgements in terms of proposed polarities or judge them. They may argue that a proposed polarity is being inappropriately highlighted, or that the polarized issue is (again) the basis of a societal problem, or affirm that a fundamental polarization is (again) being suppressed or ignored despite being the source of difficulties.

Any one involved in a CL7_B-contextual adjustment will naturally bring CL6_P-relevant standards to bear. This would never be used to block appropriate adaptations because there is respect for the need for such modifications.

Adaptations, in turn, should not be determined, much less agreed and implemented, without respecting relevant standards being upheld by members of the group.

CL6_P-relevant standards have a permanence and ethical power that makes them useful in evaluating CL5_P-versions. They serve as a guide and reference and will ensure the version is suitable for use.

A personalized version in a particular situation may cause a person to review the standards being deemed relevant and check whether they actually apply in this particular case.

CL5_P-versionswill either minimize or enhance the impact of social concern for CL3_S-tensions depending on the person's stance.

Appreciating tensions will inject emotion into the situation and that is liable to intensify a person's version.

Interpersonal and social CL3_S-tensions are everywhere and always concerning. If a CL1_B-plausible explanationrefers to tensions in the situation, this will lead to concern about them. But even if there is no reference to tensions, then this will likely lead to questions about whether these might exist and be relevant.

Tensions show up as frictions, pain-points and conflicts which typically generate a demand for an explanation.