The Dating Dilemma

What is Dating?

Dating appears to be the willingness aspect of a larger endeavour: often getting married or finding a lifelong partner, sometimes finding a romantic companion for social activities and sexual enjoyment.

So dating is about whether or not to get involved with another person, and ultimately become seriously involved. That means the Tree should provide assistance in understanding and managing dating.

The Initial Attempt

Dating takes courage and three Centres dominate initial efforts: Participation-L4, Beliefs-L2, and Trying-L1.

Unless a person is willing to participate in the dating scene, nothing will ever happen. Participation may involve attending events like celebrations or dances, taking up a social hobby or sport where suitable others will be present, becoming part of a gym or a club scene, or socializing in a café or over a canteen lunch

Participation is justified by beliefs about dating. Beliefs about oneself and the requirements for a suitable partner are also applied prior to trying to date. Beliefs may focus on looks, on work, on behaviours, on responsiveness, on the process of relating, on fate, chemistry and more. At present, some beliefs negating contact are referred to as red flags and those recommending contact are green flags.

Ultimately, or sometimes as soon as possible, there must be an actual date that allows time together and physical closeness: coffee, dinner, walk in the park, or similar. This is trying—with the full knowledge that the person may well turn out to be unsuitable or even intolerable.

Facing the Reality

Following an initial connection, involvement starts developing, and fantasies become confronted by an emerging reality. Facts about the person flow from conversations and interactions. The potential partner's way of relating and hopes for the future inevitably emerge with additional dates. Facing reality will impact on participation, beliefs and attempts to become more involved.

Suddenly, numerous channels come into play. Even if the person wants to avoid reality, friends and family will make their own assessment and be feeding views back subtly or stridently. Such views can be discouraging or encouraging.

If all the evidence and feedback points in the same negative direction, you will quickly discontinue your involvement. If positive, you will keep trying with more confidence that this is a worthwhile relationship that could develop into something meaningful and even serious.

Buttressing Trust

The focus for participation now moves from the dating scene to the emerging relationship. The primary consideration in deepening that involvement is whether the potential partner can be trusted: click on the thumbnail.

Trust is primarily about feeling safe, respected and accepted as you are, but also depends on receiving affection and admiration. But trusting will only emerge in its strongest form if you are trustworthy and deserve trust too.

Because trust is so difficult to become certain about, learning is crucial in deciding whether to commit yourself. Reflecting on your experiences during and between dates plays a major role, but there is also a lot to learn, especially when younger.

Self-help books, family members, close friends, relationship influencers and therapists: all can be a source of learning, but not equally reliably.

As you learn more, you have to weigh up the potentials in the relationship and decide for yourself about the risks in becoming serious.

Ultimately all the channels in the Tree are potentially relevant. Most can produce a negative result (e.g. appraisal or guidance may be positive or negative) and some can operate in a negative form (e.g. the incentive may be a disincentive, moderationmay be destabilization).



Having focused here on becoming seriously involved, how does it go wrong?

Originally posted: 20-May-2026.