Structuring Organizations: Overview

The Original «Levels of Work»

These discoveries were originally developed from observations of managerial roles and the behaviour of managers within large organizations. The hierarchy discovered by Elliot Jaques and Wilfred Brown was referred to regularly as «levels of work».

The Table below offers a summary of the material to be developed in this section. The attempt to be fully general means the language is perhaps slightly strained. Elaboration and examples in the Topics to follow should clarify matters.

Turf disputes associated with Jaques's heritage have bedevilled the field for many years. Labels and specifications of levels have sparked particular controversy: see discussion of alternatives.

L Responsibility Label Need to be Met Response to be Made
WL7 Total
Coverage
Determination of organizational identity.
WL6 Multi-field Coverage Policy formulation and control
WL5 Field
Coverage
Strategy design and implementation
WL4 Comprehensive Provision Management control of developments
WL3 Systematic Provision Operational control of concrete systems
WL2 Situational Response Resolution of open-ended concrete cases
WL-1 Prescribed Output Responses to concrete demands.

A table comparing names for levels in this Framework to similar names for types in the methods of managing-PH'5Q2t and modes in strengthening managing in the face of complexity-PH'5Q2C is provided here, together with the link to using language-PH'5.

Organization Structure & Management of Work

  • There are 7 potential levels of work as shown in the above Table. These levels are about defining a structure for management within an organization.
  • The central issue in designing structures and managing a large organization is: what full-time posts are needed at which levels.

Review the distinction between posts and roles.

  • The level of work specified for the top post is always the minimum required. The scope, complexity and potential social impact of the organization depends on this minimum. However, all organizations, even the smallest, should address the higher levels of work in regard to determining suitable values and goals.
  • The variety of specialized activities (kinds of work) combined with the number of levels with specific, formally defined full-time posts determines the organizational complexity and the challenges for managing effectively.
  • Choice of size is a function of activities that are viewed as unavoidable and those that are aspirational. The greater the aspiration for scope and impact, the more sophisticated the organisation required, and so the more full-time roles in higher levels needed.

Describing the Work-Levels

The next topic offers a basic account of the nature of the output at each level in terms of needs to be met and responses to be made. Examples are provided to illustrate characteristic level-specific tasks, jobs and organizations. The characteristic time-scales, deadlines for task completion, are identified. Common titles given to posts are noted.

Following this exposition, a review is provided and various further implications and perspectives will be explored.


 

 

 

 

 

Originally posted: 10-Jan-2014