Purpose Domain Controls

Frameworks

Ethical Choice Methods (PH'6)

See Ch.6 in Working with Values with associated Tables. Download here.

Below is a provisional analysis of pairing and what may be called "ethical auras":

Maturation of Politics (PH'6C)

This is posted in detail in the Political Maturation section of the Politics Satellite.

Determinants of Governance (PH'6CHK)

This is posted in detail in the Political Choice section of the Politics Satellite .

The framework was also examined in the Architecture Room as part of the investigation of root projections and the hypothesis that psychosocial pressures existed to energize the meeting of Domain-based Primal Needs. See the PH'6CK account here.

Governance was chosen as an example of the difference between a framework that is requisite, and a framework that takes account of my specific situation and interests. See account and Tree diagrams.

Here is and update of the Governance Tree and the current self-centred version. The upper pole of the internal duality has been changed from "Making Autonomy Constructive" to "Making Autonomy Participative" because that indicates what "constructive" means and clarifies the operation of a pressure for selflessness.

Political Life : Exercising Autonomy in Society (PH'6CsH)

This is posted in detail in the Political Life in Society section of the Politics Satellite.

Legitimation of Politics (PH'6CsHK)

This is posted in detail in the section dealing with political legitimacy and the handling of tensions in the Politics Satellite.

This framework was originally labeled "participation in politics". However, subsequent research suggest that the •CsHK Tree acts as a controller of the primal means. Legitimation is proposed as the controller in the Purpose Domain.

The labeling of the internal duality has also been adjusted slightly to provide consistency in the formulation. Below are the two updated Trees.